There is a moment in the lifecycle of every mining fraud when the fraudster needs to create urgency. They have raised the initial capital. They have spent months building credibility. Now they need investors to commit the larger sums that represent the real prize. The production decision announcement is the tool they use to manufacture that urgency, and it is one of the most effective weapons in the fraudster’s arsenal.
In a genuine mining project, the production decision is a significant milestone. It is the point at which the company’s board, having reviewed a bankable feasibility study, obtained the necessary permits, secured the financing, and satisfied itself that the project is economically viable, commits to building the mine. It triggers substantial capital expenditure, mobilisation of contractors, procurement of equipment, and a detailed construction schedule. It is a decision with legal, financial, and operational consequences that are immediately visible to anyone watching the project.
A legitimate production decision is preceded by years of work. There will be a preliminary economic assessment, then a pre-feasibility study, then a full feasibility study, each progressively more detailed and more expensive to produce. By the time the production decision is announced, hundreds of millions of dollars may already have been spent on studies, exploration, and permitting. The production decision is the end of a long process, not the beginning of one.
The fraudster’s production decision is a press release. Nothing more. It announces that the company has decided to proceed to production, that construction will commence on a specified date, and that the project is expected to produce a certain number of ounces of gold at a certain cost per ounce. The language is borrowed from legitimate mining announcements. The format is professional. The numbers are invented.
What the fraudster does not have is the feasibility study that should precede the announcement. They do not have the environmental permits. They do not have the construction contracts. They do not have the equipment orders. They do not have the financing in place. They have a press release and a bank account waiting for investor funds.
The announcement is timed to coincide with a capital raise. Investors are told that the production decision has been made and that the window to participate at the current price is closing. The urgency is artificial. The deadline is manufactured. But the combination of an official-sounding announcement and a ticking clock is enough to push investors who have been wavering into committing their money.
One of the most reliable indicators of a fraudulent production decision is the absence of the permits that would need to be in place before any legitimate mine could break ground. Environmental impact assessments, mining licences, water use permits, community agreements, and construction permits are not optional. They are legal requirements, and obtaining them takes years in virtually every jurisdiction.
A fraudster announcing a production decision without these permits in place is announcing something that cannot legally happen. When you ask to see the permits, the fraudster will have explanations. The permits are in process. The government has given verbal approval and the paperwork is a formality. A local partner is handling the regulatory side. None of these explanations are acceptable. Either the permits exist and can be shown to you, or the production decision is a fiction.
Verify every permit directly with the issuing authority. Do not accept copies. Do not accept the fraudster’s word. Contact the relevant government ministry or regulatory body and ask whether the permits listed have been issued, are current, and cover the specific activities described. This single check will expose most fraudulent production decisions.
Ask for the feasibility study. A bankable feasibility study for a gold mine is a substantial document, typically running to hundreds of pages, produced by a recognised engineering firm, covering every aspect of the project from ore processing to environmental management to economic modelling. It will have been prepared by a team of specialists and will carry the professional certification of Qualified Persons in multiple disciplines.
If the company cannot produce a bankable feasibility study, their production decision has no technical foundation. A pre-feasibility study is not sufficient to support a production decision in any reputable jurisdiction. A preliminary economic assessment is even further from sufficient. If all they can show you is a preliminary assessment or a management estimate, the production decision has been announced on the basis of work that does not support it.
The fraudster will often acknowledge that the full feasibility study is still being finalised, suggesting that the production decision has been made in anticipation of the study confirming what is already known. This reversal of the proper sequence, deciding to build before the study is complete, is a fundamental departure from sound practice and should be treated as a serious warning sign.
If the fraud is running long enough, the fraudster must eventually explain why construction has not commenced despite the production decision having been announced. The explanations multiply and evolve. Equipment delivery has been delayed. A financing tranche has not yet been received. Weather or ground conditions have pushed the schedule. A contractor has been replaced. A permitting issue that was thought to be resolved has required additional time.
Each explanation buys more time and often triggers another round of capital raising. Investors who have already committed are reluctant to accept that they have been defrauded. They prefer to believe the delays are genuine and that the mine will eventually be built. This sunk cost psychology is something the fraudster deliberately cultivates. The longer they can maintain the appearance of progress, the more capital they can extract before the scheme collapses.
When a company announces a production decision and invites you to invest on the basis of that announcement, Gate 4 requires specific verification before any capital is committed.
Obtain and review the bankable feasibility study. Verify that it was produced by a recognised engineering firm with Qualified Persons identified and certifying specific sections. Check the date of the study and confirm it is current.
Request evidence of all required permits and verify each one directly with the issuing authority. Any permit that cannot be verified does not exist for the purposes of your due diligence.
Ask for evidence of contractor appointments, equipment orders, and financing commitments. A real production decision leaves a paper trail of contracts and commitments. If that paper trail does not exist, the production decision is not real.
Conduct a site visit after the announced construction commencement date. If the site shows no evidence of construction activity despite the announcement, you are dealing with a fraudster.
The production decision farce works because most investors do not perform these checks. They accept the announcement as evidence that the mine is real. It is not. It is evidence only that someone has written a press release. Gate 4 requires you to look behind the press release every time.
← Back